|
|
|
|
In a touching tribute to the late Marco Muzzo in last Saturday's New in Homes section, writer Pat Brennan described an incident in which the developer was standing at the bottom of a deep excavation at the site of the former Greenwood Race Track, trying to figure out a way to get loaded dump trucks up a steep, dirt ramp that had become a river of mud. The story of why Muzzo had to complete such extensive excavation on the site is a fascinating tale, and involves a dispute at Ontario's highest court between the former owner and a would-be buyer of the same property. It's also a story of how one developer stepped up to the plate and produced an attractive subdivision when another builder turned down the opportunity. The 33.7-hectare site bounded by Lake Shore Blvd. E. and Queen St. E., between Coxwell and Woodbine had been a racetrack for 140 years before 1993. The south portion was once under water and had been extended by landfill. The site itself was contaminated by incinerator ash, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and leaking underground storage tanks. In short, it was an environmental disaster. In March 1994, a numbered Ontario corporation agreed to purchase the entire Greenwood Race Track site from the Ontario Jockey Club for $35 million. The purchaser had the right to terminate the agreement before May 20, 2004 if, acting reasonably, it believed that the property was subject to soil conditions or environmental contamination which would materially increase the cost of converting the site to residential use. The purchaser, whose principal was Herbert Green, retained two experts who reported that the site contained large quantities of peat and methane gas, and the servicing cost would be increased due mainly to a high underground water table. On the day before the deadline, the numbered company exercised its right to terminate the agreement, and asked for the return of its $10-million deposit. Lawyers for the Jockey Club responded to the termination by saying that their client disagreed with the purchaser's experts, and it had no right to terminate the agreement. In July 1994, the matter came before Justice Romain Pitt in Toronto. Without going to trial, the purchaser company asked the court to declare that the agreement had been properly terminated. At the request of the purchaser, Construction Control Group had prepared a report which estimated that the cost of remedying the existing soil contamination would be $8.3 million. It identified four major problems with the soil:Bob Aaron is a Toronto real estate lawyer. He can be reached by email at bob@aaron.ca, phone 416-364-9366 or fax 416-364-3818. |
